Recently,
I have visited one unusual, in my view, exhibition in the Shusev Museum of
Architecture in Moscow. It calls “The Russian Protodesign”. The exhibition
reminds about beginnings of contemporary design, which we can find on
exposition of the most useful things in Russian domestic in the period from
XVIII to the middle of XX centuries, such as work tools, houseware or children
toys.
Protodesign
is a sort of product design. Each object or thing was developed during long
period of time. The technology of producing, the construction of the details,
their forms – everything came through lots of prototypes. Design and shape
changes a lot depend of time, but the purposes for most of things stay the
same.
In
the past, craftspeople always tried to find the most effective way of working
with one or another material. Again and again they searched lots of methods to
rise the quality of material. Thus, when master develops a new technology with
higher results, the design will change.
One
of the oldest technologies was weaving. In the past in Russia rustics use this
process to produce not only fabric for clothes, but also bast shoes “lapti” and
baskets for different things. “Lapti” were weaved on special moulds with bast.
Moulds
for bast shoes
Also Russian bast was used for children toys and even for musical instruments such as fife.
Prototypes
of fifes
A
cart wheel
Bricks
from different private enterprises
To
conclude, today, lots of things, which were an important part of the household,
become unnecessary, because of technological development. For example, we can
find wash-hand-stand or torch for candle only in museum or in Grandmother’s
garret.
Wash-hand-stands
Torch
for candle
Anastasia Balykina
You have written a very interesting post, thank you. I have also visited this exhibition approximately 1 month ago. What was disappointing to me ( not considering the quality of art work ) is the state which this exposition space had. There was about - 10 degrees in this room and wind was blowing through holes in the walls. And it was a pity that I couldn't able to get to know with this exhibition closer just because of a disaster condition that this museum had. I hope it was a better place when you were there.
ReplyDeleteYulia